Legal Opinion

Anglada v. Moyer

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 2, 1921No. Nos. 1409, 1410PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. Interference proceedings between Joseph A. Anglada, ■ Fredellia H. Moyer, Dallas C. Carroll, and Richard S. Bryant. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, awarding priority to Moyer, Anglada and Bryant separately appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice,

These appeals are from a decision of the Patent Office in an interference case relating to a locking device for *360a demountable tire rim for automobiles. There are four interferants. Moyer was successful before each of the three tribunals of the Office. Anglada and Bryant appeal — Anglada against Moyer, Carroll, and Bryant; and Bryant against Carroll, Anglada, and Moyer.

The question involved is one of fact, and a careful study of the record fails to reveal palpable error on the part of the Commissioner. Therefore, following the rule announced in Valerius et al. v. Pfouts,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Valerius v. PfoutsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clement v. McQuarrieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API