Legal Opinion

Dano v. Collins

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 15, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 88-420PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOSS, Presiding Judge.

This case arises from the trial court’s consideration of a declaratory judgment action which requested that A.R.S. § 13-3102(A)(1) and (2), which prohibits the carrying of concealed weapons, be declared unconstitutional as violating the Arizona Constitution art. 2, § 26. Appellees requested and were granted summary judgment. Because we find the statute constitutional, we affirm the trial court.

Article 2, § 26 of the Arizona Constitution provides:

The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the State shall not be impaired, but nothing in this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  3. Matthews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. New Times, Inc. v. Arizona Board of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Carfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. SchelinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. HamdanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API