Legal Opinion
Boykins v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 12, 1976No. 7982PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALLAGHER, Associate Judge:
After appellant Boykins had waived his right to trial by jury, he was tried by the court and convicted on two counts of armed robbery 1 and one count of assault with intent to rob while armed, 2 all in connection with the holdup of a liquor store in Washington, D.C.
Appellant’s principal claim of error is that certain incriminatory oral statements which he made to agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Norfolk, Virginia, should have been suppressed because they were made in the absence of, and as a result of interviews conducted without notice to, his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Darwin v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Winston Valdemar SpringerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- James W. Killough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- United States of America Ex Rel. Michael O'COnnOr v. The State of New Jersey and Howard YeagerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Shreeves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Bliss v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- United States v. Wilbert E. HackleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.