Legal Opinion

James W. Killough v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 4, 1962No. 16398PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges EDGERTON, BAZELON and WASHINGTON join.

Appellant, indicted for first degree murder in strangling his wife to death, was convicted of manslaughter. The case is another in which a conviction of a serious crime has been brought about with the aid of a confession orally given soon after — in this case the next day — a written confession had been obtained in circumstances which rendered it inadmissible. Other oral confessions had preceded the written one and like it were inadmissible.

Three cases involving this problem have been decided fairly recently…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Lewis L. Wayne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  4. Fund for Constitutional Government v. National Archives and Records ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. William H. Fuller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API