Legal Opinion
RAGSDALE v. LORA
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 15, 2022No. 2:20-cv-16123Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY THOMAS RAGSDALE, JR., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:20-cv-16123 (BRM) (ESK) HECTOR LORA, et al., OPINION Defendants. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Defendants Vincent Gentile (“Gentile”) and Luis Guzman’s (“Guzman”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Thomas Ragsdale, Jr.’s (“Ragsdale”) Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 47) and Defendant Hector Lora’s (“Lora”) (together with Gentile and Guzman, “Moving Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.