Legal Opinion

Tulsa Terminal, Storage & Transfer Co. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1933No. 23180PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.

On October 25, 1930, the employer, Tulsa Terminal, Storage & Transfer Company, on form 2, furnished by the State Industrial Commission, filed with the Commission employer’s first notice of injury, in which it gives the date of accident as October 7, 1930, and in answer to the question, “Business, Goods Produced, Work Done or Kind of Trade or Transportation,” it is written, “Truck transportation”; and in answer to the question, “Location of Plant or Place Where Accident Occurred,” the answer is, “Petroleum Exposition”; and in answer to the question, “Occupation When Injured,” it is written,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Claim of Doey v. Clarence P. Howland Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Drumbight Feed Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Hughes Motor Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Skelly Oil Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. J. B. Herd Hardware Co. v. KirbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hardy Sanitarium v. DehartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Consolidated Motor Freight Terminal v. VineyardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Sterling Milk Products Co. v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Continental Baking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Frates v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API