Legal Opinion

Atlantic Greyhound Corporation v. Lauritzen

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1950No. 10939_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

In a death case grounded upon negligence, after a directed verdict for the appellant and the grant of a new trial upon motion of the appellees, a second trial resulted in a substantial verdict for damages, with a motion for new trial by the appellant denied and from the judgment, the present appeal. The appeal is based upon alleged absence of substantial evidence to show actionable negligence and alleged errors in the rulings of the court.

On the morning of January 7, 1946, the appellant’s bus was traveling east upon the south side of U. S. Highway No. 70 from Knoxville,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Memphis St. Ry Co. v. CavellTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Jaggers v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. Lauritzen v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1948

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carol Gagne FUSCO, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Tiedman v. American Pigment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  3. Carman v. FishelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Scholl v. Felmont Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  5. Durkin v. Pet Milk Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API