Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. Prior to tlie passage of what is known as the uniform negotiable instruments law, the holder of a promissory note was not protected from the maker’s defense that the consideration thereof was immoral and illegal, even though the holder may have purchased the note before it was due, and without notice of any defect therein or *669defense thereto. Thus, a promissory note given in the year 1921 for the purchase-price of liquors sold in violation of the law is unenforceable, even in the hands of a bona fide holder for value, who takes the same without notice of the consideration. Civil Code…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watkins v. StulbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  2. Webb v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. White County Bank v. Clermont State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Crigler & Crigler Co. v. LaramoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tilley v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Peoples Loan & Finance Corp. v. LatimerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Snow v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  4. Credit Equipment Corp. v. PendleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. Hughes v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API