Legal Opinion
In re Pravda
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 17, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent, whom we suspended for three years on October 27, 1983, now seeks reargument, and, upon reargument, a reduction in the length of the suspension.
*81Respondent seeks to place before the court biographical and personal information which, due to his conceded neglect, was not presented to the hearing panel or this court before. Respondent claims he thought the court would appoint a referee to take testimony after the Disciplinary Committee moved to confirm the hearing panel’s report. He blames his confusion upon his failure to engage other counsel to seek advice, which…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In re BradeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re OzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re BrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
4Cited by6 opinions
- In re LeavittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re AlejandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re LeBowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re BenickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.