Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 2, 1989No. 86-1226PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING
Before: HIGGINBOTHAM, SCIRICA and GARTH, Circuit Judges.
1. After consideration of the contentions raised in the petition for rehearing filed by Westinghouse Electric Corporation in the above-entitled case and the response thereto by the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission, and all judges who participated in the decision of this Court having asked for rehearing on the basis of the contentions raised in the petition for panel rehearing, the petition for rehearing is granted. Reargument is not granted in this matter. The panel is unanimously of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Connecticut v. TealSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lewis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Phillip N. Lockhart, Charles B. Wilson, James Lowery, James P. Durham and Thomas Bradley v. Westinghouse Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- 50 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1099, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,295 Marcel Verbraeken, Cross-Appellant v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- John Dibiase v. Smithkline Beecham CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Advanced Power Systems, Inc. v. Hi-Tech Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee. v. J.M. HUBER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.