Legal Opinion
Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Mayor's Commission on Human Rights
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 1987No. 14913PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLANIGAN, Judge.
Rule 87.04 1 reads, in pertinent part:
In any proceeding which involves the validity of a municipal ordinance ..., such municipality shall be made a party, and shall be entitled to be heard, and, if the ... ordinance ... is alleged to be unconstitutional, the Attorney General of the state shall also be served with a copy of the proceeding and be entitled to be heard.”
This proceeding involves the validity of §§ 18A-1 through 18A-30 of the Springfield City Code. These sections of the Code will be referred to as “the ordinance.” The petition, filed in the circuit court, sought a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Neal v. DrennanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Vanderson v. VandersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Spellerberg v. HuhnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lake Lotawana Ass'n v. City of Lake LotawanaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Mayor's Commission on Human Rights of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- Reed v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Dark v. MRO Mid-Atlantic Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Witty v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.