Yates v. Durk
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Commissioner.
We are reviewing the action of the trial court in sustaining a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ petition. We affirm the trial court.
Summarized, plaintiffs’ petition alleges that: plaintiffs are patrons of Reorganized School District R-l of Callaway County, and defendants constitute the Board of such District; that plaintiffs were signers of a petition for change of boundary filed July 11, 1964; that the petition for boundary change was legally sufficient to require a vote thereon; that defendants failed to properly advertise and submit to the patrons of the District at the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. BerrymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Gardner v. Springfield Gas & Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- St. Joseph Fire & Marine Insurance v. LelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- State ex rel. Alexander v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hess Construction Co. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. State Ex Rel. HarmonIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Dahl v. LangeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Leamon v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- STATE EX REL. KASHMIR CORP. v. SchmidtOregon Supreme Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.