Legal Opinion
HIZOUNI v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 13, 2024No. 2:24-cv-02487Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LOUBNA HIZOUNI, et al., CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, NO. 24-2487-KSM v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM MARSTON, J. December 13, 2024 Precluding key evidence is an extreme discovery sanction often reserved for deliberate or egregious misconduct. Here, Plaintiffs Loubna Hizouni and Tarik Zouarhi argue that the Court should preclude the report and testimony of Defendant Progressive Advanced Insurance Company’s (“Progressive”) medical expert because the expert made an audio recording of his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- ZF Meritor LLC v. Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Exxon Corp. v. Halcon Shipping Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Joyce J. Quinn v. Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware D/b/a/ Cf Motorfreight A. William KudrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- ABB Air Preheater, Inc. v. Regenerative Environmental Equipment Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.