Legal Opinion

Marvel Industries, Inc. v. Boatmen's National Bank

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 9, 1951No. 42054PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHollingsworth, J.

Plaintiff (respondent) brought this action against defendant for the recovery of $16,000 deposited by plaintiff with defendant in accordance with the provisions of a three-party contract for the sale of 196 tons of sheet steel, in which' contract plaintiff is designated as “purchaser”, one R. E. Mullen as “seller” and defendant as “escrow agent”.

Following verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $16,000 and accrued interest, defendant appealed. The grounds of its appeal are: that no submissible case was made; error in instruction No. 2 given in behalf of plaintiff; and refusal of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gleason v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Seibel v. HighamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Meredith v. MeredithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Morris v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Boland v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Cross Lumber & Millwork Co. v. BeckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. DandyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Green v. HuckstepSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Collier v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Richmond v. State Title & Guaranty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API