Richmond v. State Title & Guaranty Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentLevy, Judge
I respectfully dissent. The trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion for rehearing and overruling the general master’s findings and recommendations because those findings and recommendations were supported by competent substantial evidence. A trial court may not reject a general master’s findings of fact and conclusions drawn therefrom unless there has been a showing of clear error in that those findings or conclusions are not supported by reliable evidence and are not in accordance with prevailing law. Frank v. Frank, 75 So.2d 282 (Fla.1954); Goldman v. Smargon, 524 So.2d 479…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Frank v. FrankSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Malta v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Cradock v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Chace v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Tucker v. Dr. P. Phillips Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.