Walker v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, Chief Judge.
This diversity tort case is before us on motion of defendant Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. (“Carnival”). Carnival moves for dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(2) and improper venue, Rule 12(b)(3). 1 In the alternative, Carnival argues that the case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). 2
For the reasons outlined below, we deny the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We deny…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Shute v. Carnival Cruise LinesWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Walker v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Schlessinger v. Holland America, N.V.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Jones v. WatkinsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Banta Corp. v. Hunter Publishing Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.