Legal Opinion
Richman v. Blank
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 24, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
45 N.J. Super. 272 (1957)
132 A.2d 331
GROVER C. RICHMAN, JR., ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HERMAN BLANK, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided May 24, 1957.
Mr. David D. Furman, Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for plaintiff (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General, attorney).
Mr. Joseph Weisman argued the cause for defendant (Mr. Sanford Freedman, on the brief; Messrs. Weisman & Freedman, attorneys).
WAUGH, J.S.C.
In 1947 the defendant Herman Blank was appointed a member of the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission for a term of five years pursuant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoffman v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Lynch v. Borough of EdgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Borough of Little Ferry v. Bergen County Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Sherwood v. Bergen-Hackensack Sanitary Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Greenfield v. Passaic Valley Sewerage CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dorf v. SkolnikCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Gauntt v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF CITY OF BRIDGETONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Albert F. Ruehl Co. v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, INDUS. ED.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Bontempo v. CareyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960