Legal Opinion
In Re: Mordasky
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 30, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00077Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT IN RE: KEITH MORDASKY No. 3:20-cv-00077 (JAM) ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE On January 10, 2020, the Court received a “motion for leave” filed by Keith Mordasky. The motion states in its entirety “To Janet C. Hall: You will notice that Troop K is not invol[v]ed in these cases. Forward these drafts to my substa[t]ion address 25 Vermont Drive, Apt 14, Willimantic, CT, 06226.” Doc. #1. Attached to this “motion for leave” are four proposed complaints asserting wildly frivolous allegations of impropriety against various national…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Anthony R. Martin-Trigona, Movant. In Re George Sassower, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Abascal v. JarkosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Malley v. Corporation Counsel of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001