Legal Opinion

Craigo v. Circus-Circus Enterprises, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1990No. 18515PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Steffen, J.:

After being assaulted and robbed in the elevator of the Circus-Circus parking garage, Robert Craigo filed an action seeking both compensatory and punitive damages against Circus-Circus Enterprises, Inc. (Circus-Circus). The trial court, sitting without a jury, awarded Craigo $45,000 in compensatory damages and $1,000,000 in punitive damages. The punitive award was based upon a determination by the trial judge that Circus-Circus had acted with “malice in fact.”1

*3Circus-Circus agrees that the issue of focus on appeal is the availability of a punitive damage award…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. ThitchenerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Doud v. Las Vegas Hilton Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Pioneer Chlor Alkali Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1994
  4. Cohen v. Mirage Resorts, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State Ex Rel. Harvey v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API