Legal Opinion

Russell v. Martell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1984No. 18160PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Appellant Grant C. Mills seeks the reversal of the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment which had been entered against him.

On July 7, 1981 Mills was served with a summons and a copy of the plaintiffs’ complaint. When he did not file an answer in response, his default was entered by the court. After an ex parte hearing on a motion made by plaintiffs for judgment, judgment was granted for $63,200, attorney’s fees of $5,000 and costs of the action. In December of 1981 Mills filed a motion to set aside the default judgment supported by affidavits.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Laub v. SOUTH CENTRAL UTAH TELEPHONE ASS'NUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Calder Bros. Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Airkem Intermountain, Inc. v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hayes v. TowlesIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Pitts v. Pine Meadow Ranch, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Katz v. PierceUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Skanchy v. Calcados Ortope SAUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State, Department of Social Services v. VijilUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bonneville Tower Condominium Management Committee v. Thompson Michie Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API