Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bly v. Story

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 18, 2010No. 09SC189Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Eid

I agree with the majority that the district court properly denied Condemnees' motion to dismiss and therefore join Part IL.A. of its opinion. I disagree, however, with its conclusion that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in keeping cost of construction evidence from the jury. Maj. op. at 588. In this case, the district court permitted the jury to consider only the comparable sales method of valuation even though "no expert here could find comparable sales of driveway easements...." Story v. Bly, 217 P.3d 872, 881 (Colo.App.2008). We long ago rejected the district court's "single…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Berglund-Cherne Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Story v. BlyColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Asarco, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API