Legal Opinion
United States v. Perez
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 27, 1996No. 96 Cr. 167 (RWS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Teddy Ramos (“Ramos”) and Orlando Perez (“Perez”) have moved to suppress evidence against them. For the reasons set forth below, Ramos’ motion will be granted and Perez’s motion will be denied. Prior Proceedings
The prior proceedings in this action have been fully set forth in a prior Opinion of this court, dated September 6, 1996, familiarity with which is assumed. Those proceedings relevant to the instant motion are described below.
The eight count indictment, SI 96 Cr. 167, handed down on March 29, 1996, charges Perez with participating in and…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Mesa RithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Ostroski v. Town of SoutholdDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Moore v. AndrenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Mistretta v. ProkeschDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Kirby v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.