Legal Opinion

Dodd v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 7, 1988No. 01-87-00859-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of possession of cocaine weighing less than 28 grams, and the trial court assessed his punishment at 26 years confinement.

In his sole point of error, appellant contends that the “dynamite” or Allen1 charge given to the jury by the trial court was so coercive that it denied appellant due process of law and trial by jury.

After both sides presented vastly different evidence of what had occurred, the jury deliberated for 50 minutes, broke for lunch, and then deliberated an additional 85 minutes. A note was then delivered stating: “We, the jury,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Calicult v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Love v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1981
  5. Golden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  2. Richard Roll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API