Legal Opinion · Dissent

John R. Carney v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 27, 1963No. 13906_1Published

1DissentHastie, Circuit Judge

Essential to the majority decision is the conclusion that a Young Men’s Christian Association, in furnishing lodging to employees of the defendant railroad, acted as an “agent” of the railroad within the meaning of section 1 of the F.E.L.A.1 Otherwise, the railroad could not be held liable for negligence of the Y.M.C.A. in improperly making up the bed from which plaintiff fell in his sleep.2 I am unable to agree that the Y.M.C.A. was the railroad’s “agent”, as that term is used in the controlling statute.

The leading case is Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific R. R. Co., 1958, 356 U.S. 326, 78 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Ward v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. North Chicago Street Railroad v. DudgeonIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Story v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  5. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. PeytonIllinois Supreme Court · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API