Legal Opinion
Ray v. City of Edmond
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 29, 1981No. 81-1155PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P.. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The *680cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The City of Edmond, Oklahoma, brings this appeal from a decision of the district court awarding judgment on a jury verdict which found the City liable to Jerry Dean Ray for nominal and punitive damages as the result of an arrest effected by officers of the City’s police department.
Ray…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gurule v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Love v. Mayor, of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Millard W. Simineo v. School District No. 16, Park County, WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. City Of MissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Miller v. City of MissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Korotki v. GoughanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Ray v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981