Legal Opinion

Korotki v. Goughan

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 28, 1984No. Civ. K-79-1833PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Korotki, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and state based law, instituted this case seeking damages and injunctive relief against eleven defendants who may be grouped as the “Maryland defendants,” the “Delaware defendants,” the “Fenwick Island defendants” and one defendant, “Sussex' County, Delaware.” 1 Subsequently, plaintiff entered into a Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal of his claims against all of the Maryland and Delaware defendants 2 and a Stipulation of Dismissal with defendant, Sussex County, Delaware, of his claims against that…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McFadyen v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  3. Hebron Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. v. WhitelockCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Frizzell Construction Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1991
  5. Rice v. DunnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API