Legal Opinion
Treadaway v. Williams
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1964No. Nos. 1363, 1364PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YARRUT, Judge.
These two suits were consolidated for trial in the district court and for argument here; both resulting from the default in the execution of an agreement of sale and purchase of an immovable between Vendors (Williams and Hood) and Purchaser (Luke Motor Co., Inc.), confected by Realtor (Treadaway).
Realtor filed suit No. 1363 against Vendors and Purchaser for $630.00 (commission on sale), with legal interest from judicial demand, plus an attorney’s fee of $200.00.
Defendant (Purchaser) filed its answer with a reconventional demand against the Realtor for the return of its deposit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Elliott v. DupuySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- Di Cristina v. WeiserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Fox v. DollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Rodriguez v. ShroderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Carter v. Morris Building & Loan Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Bank & Trust Company v. FrenchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Smith v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Solar Gen. Contractor, Ltd. v. Urban Redevelopments, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Nolton Dalcourt v. Thomas MoyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Young v. StevensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.