Legal Opinion
Schmuckley v. Rite Aid Corporation
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 14, 2020No. 2:12-cv-01699Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the No. 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-EFB STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ex rel. 12 LOYD F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR., ORDER 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 RITE AID CORPORATION, 16 Defendant. 17 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. LOYD 18 F.SCHMUCKLEY, JR., 19 Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 RITE AID CORPORATION, 22 Defendant. 23 24 Three related motions are before the court. Defendant Rite Aid moves to exclude 25 plaintiffs’ proposed sampling methodology, Sampling Mot., ECF No. 195, and also moves to 26 exclude and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- City of Pomona v. Sqm North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Mary Hendow Julie Albertson v. University of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.