Legal Opinion
Krueger v. Push & Pull Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Push & Pull Enterprises, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided March 17, 1988No. 19-20427PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS NONDIS-CHARGEABILITY ADVERSARY PROCEEDING AGAINST CHAPTER 11 DEBTOR
FRANCIS G. CONRAD, Bankruptcy Judge * .
The issue to be decided by us is whether a corporate debtor that seeks reorganization under Chapter 11 of Title 11, United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq. is subject to the nondischargeability provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 523. 1 Because we hold that a Chapter 11 corporate debtor is not subject to the dischargeability provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 523, the debtor's motion to dismiss Krueger’s § 523(a)(6) complaint will be granted.
Debtor,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Spring Valley Farms, Inc. v. Crow (In re Spring Valley Farms, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- In Re Al Copeland Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1991
- In Re Spring Valley Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999
- Pucello v. Bisignani (In Re Bisignani)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.