Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Foote
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho
In Equity. Suit by the Twin Falls Canal Company, Limited, against Joseph C. Foote, Charles N. Foster, and others. On motion to remand to state court.
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, District Judge.
By this action the plaintiff, the owner of a large canal system diverting water from a natural stream and making distribution thereof to its several stockholders for the irrigation of their farms, seeks an adjudication of the conflicting rights of itself and other claimants to the flow of Snake river, and prays an injunction restraining other users from interfering with its rights. Proceeding under the authority of Act Cong. June 17, 1902, c. 1093, 32 Stat. 388 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1909, p. 596), commonly known as the “Reclamation Act,” the Secretary of the •…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Public Clearing House v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Insurance Co. v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Twin City Bank v. NebekerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cochran v. TeeheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- In Re Uintah BasinUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Stanfield v. Umatilla River Water Users' Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1911
- Strawberry Water Users Ass'n v. Bureau of ReclamationUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Baker v. CalhounDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.