Legal Opinion
Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. v. Kendo Holdings Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 8, 2024No. 3:22-cv-08958Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 AMARTE USA HOLDINGS, INC., Case No. 22-cv-08958-CRB 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 10 v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 11 KENDO HOLDINGS INC., et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Plaintiff Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) sued Defendants for various 14 trademark infringement violations arising out of Defendants’ alleged sale of Marc Jacobs 15 Beauty EYE-CONIC eyeshadow. See Compl. (dkt. 1). During the litigation, the Court 16 granted Kendo leave to amend its answer to add a counterclaim for trademark…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.