Andrews v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
The United States appeals the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees to plaintiffs/appellees/cross-appellants (“plaintiffs”) pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, on plaintiffs’ claims' under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 960(a). The government contends the fee award was disproportionately high. Plaintiffs cross-appeal, claiming the award was too low. We agree with the government and remand for a redetermination of attorney’s fees.
I. BACKGROUND
The opinion we…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Alco Pacific, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- United States v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Briggins v. Elwood Tri, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
- Marvin KAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- James v. Wash Depot Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.