Mountain Park Institute, Inc. v. Lovill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The first assignment of error is addressed to the question whether the complaint states a cause of action. The appellants argue that it does not, and that the demurrer ore tewus should have been sustained. The proceeding was brought, they say, not by the executors named in the will, but against the executors, the legatees, and the devi-sees by the plaintiffs who, having no authority or power to administer the testator’s estate cannot prosecute a suit to construe the will, or to control the discretion vested in the executors, without at least specifically charging bad faith or arbitrary…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Keith v. . ScalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Alsbrook v. . ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Joyner v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Burrell v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elmore v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Spencer v. . McCleneghanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Hamilton v. City of Rocky MountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Finley v. . FinleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Jackson v. LangleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.