Legal Opinion

Schumacher Co. v. Posey

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1948No. A-1831PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simpson

This cause is here solely on the question of whether the trial court erred in declining to submit to the jury issues on discovered peril which had been requested by the plaintiff, Marcus L. Posey. In his action for damages growing out of a highway traffic collision, a jury convicted him of contributory negligence and the judgment of the district court was against him. The Court of Civil Appeals concluded there was no error in failing to submit discovered peril to the jury and remanded the cause to the district court for another trial. 212 S. W. (2d) 199.

Posey sued The Schumacher Company for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Northern Texas Traction Co. v. WeedTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Parks v. Airline Motor Coaches, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Baker v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Terry v. EnglishTexas Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. RT Herrin Petroleum Transport Co. v. ProctorTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Texas & New Orleans Ry. Co. v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Welch v. Ada Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Muniz v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API