Legal Opinion
Spokane County v. Specialty Auto and Truck Painting, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 18, 2003No. 21027-8-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
79 P.3d 448 (2003)
SPOKANE COUNTY, Respondent,
v.
SPECIALTY AUTO AND TRUCK PAINTING, INC.; Ken and Debra Orrino, a marital community, Petitioners.
No. 21027-8-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Four.
August 19, 2003.
Publication Ordered November 18, 2003.
Carl E. Hueber, Charles M. Andersen, Attorneys at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellants.
Timothy M. Durkin, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
Washington court rule, CR 41, like its federal counterpart, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, requires dismissal with prejudice, even of a voluntary nonsuit, "when obtained by a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mead School District No. 354 v. Mead Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Oregon Mut. Ins. Co. v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Oregon Mutual Insurance v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Burley v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- City of College Place v. StaudenmaierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spokane County v. Specialty Auto and Truck Painting, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Spokane County v. Specialty Auto & Truck Painting, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004