Legal Opinion

Frye v. Saunders

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 29, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.

The will of Abbie M. Smart contains a number of specific bequests and money legacies, but no residuary clause. There is remaining in the hands of the executor approximately $70,000, and he brings this petition for instructions as to what persons are entitled to it. The occasion for the application is the presence in the will of the following paragraph: “ I give and devise nothing whatever to my father’s first wife’s relations and nothing to my mother’s relations; and hope that my wish as here in expressed will be clearly understood.”

Amos Holt, the father of the testatrix, was twice married,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sanger v. BourkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. BuffumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Child v. ChildMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Cavan v. WoodburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Shea v. MaitlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Loring v. DexterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Old Colony Trust Co. v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Dexter v. DexterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Nickerson v. HardingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Johnson v. BrinkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API