Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Currier

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1905No. S.F. No. 3298PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff is a daughter and an heir at law, and defendant is the surviving husband, of Emily F. Currier, deceased. The said decedent left a will in which she bequeathed and devised certain property to named persons, and gave the residue of her estate to the defendant herein for life, with remainder over to plaintiff and her sister, Letitia C. Hendry. During her lifetime the decedent executed a deed to defendant conveying to him in fee the certain lot of land described in the complaint herein; and this action was brought to have said deed set aside and annulled on the grounds, — 1. That it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sacramento Bank v. AlcornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hodgkins v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. MacLeod v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Nilson v. SarmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Weber v. McClevertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API