McDaniel v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The appellant was convicted of forgery in the second degree. The indictment follows the form laid down for forgery in the second degree in so far as that form covers section 6910, Code 1907, except that it contains the following additional words, “and the grand jury further charge that said alteration, forgery or counterfeiting consisted in signing the name of J. R. Upshaw where the same appears on the face of said instrument.” Form 62, p. 670, Code 1907. There is no form in -the Code for the latter part of section 6910, for uttering and publishing as true a forged check as set out in the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Amos v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Hargrove v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Sharp v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Rector v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.