Pullen v. Fagan
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtCarrico, J.
Esther Groves Fagan, the plaintiff, filed a motion for judgment against Harriett W. Pullen, the defendant, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained when an automobile operated by the plaintiff was in a collision with one operated by the defendant.
There have been two jury trials of this action. The first trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant but, upon the motion of the plaintiff, the trial court set aside the verdict and awarded a new trial, “limited solely to the quantum of damages which the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant.”
At the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Interstate Veneer Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Adams v. AllenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Whitley v. PattersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- Crist v. Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Bedget v. LewinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bannon v. PfiffnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Riley v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
- Balzer & Associates, Inc. v. Lakes on 360, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1995
- Medlar v. MohanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Whitt v. Ervin B. Davis & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.