Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Davis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1933No. 23896PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The legal question presented is within a very narrow compass. It is whether the record of the Industrial Commission, showing its finding and order for compensation for injuries sustained by a claimant, may be pleaded and introduced in evi dence in a subsequent proceeding by the dependents of such former claimant wherein they seek compensation for his death.

The trial court answered that question in the negative, and rejected the proffered evidence. The Court of Appeals held it was admissible. The theory upon which it was held to be competent seems to be that in each instance the Industrial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Industrial Commission v. KamrathOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State ex rel. Crawford v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Winston v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  2. Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Manns v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Magma Copper Co. v. NaglichArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Industrial Commission v. BartholomeOhio Supreme Court · 1934

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API