Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Consolidated District No. 13 v. Smith

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 18, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

Original proceeding in mandamus. Relator, claiming to be a consolidated school district, seeks to compel the State Auditor to register its bonds. The auditor challenged the corporate existence of the-district as a consolidated school district and refused registration. The facts follow:

On April 2, 1929, there existed a town school district designated as “School District of Gideon.” On said day and at the annual school meeting in said district there was submitted to the voters the proposition to divide the district by detaching therefrom seventy-one sections of land. The proposition carried.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Conkling v. SweaneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  2. State Ex Inf. Mansur v. McKownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. State Ex Rel. Buckley v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. State Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 9 v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Taylor v. Pretended Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. State v. Milan C-II School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. De Berg v. County Board of Education of Butler CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. School District of Kirkwood R-7 v. ZeibigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 5 v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API