Legal Opinion

Silcock v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1901PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. J. L. Camp.

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

The appellant, Ellen Silcock, joined "by her husband, brought this suit against Mary H. Baker, who was .joined by her husband, in the form of an action of trespass to try title to recover certain parcels of land. Appellees, defendants below, answered hy a plea of not guilty, and plead that the deed under which Mrs. Silcock claims the property was made by Mary H. Baker to her separate property, and that her pretended acknowledgment thereto was taken by Andrew Silcock, the husband of Ellen, and for that reason the deed was void, and a cancellation thereof prayed for.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Berry v. DonleyTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Johnson v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Rothschild v. DaugherTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bexar Building & Loan Ass'n v. HeadyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Clements v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Easterling v. MurpheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Daugherty v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API