Legal Opinion

EWY v. SOUTHWEST CUPID

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 2015No. 112,999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DEBORAH B. BARNES, Judge.

T 1 Petitioner Mary Ewy (Claimant) seeks review of an Order of a three-judge panel of the Workers' Compensation Court of Existing Claims affirming the order of the trial court. The trial court denied Claimant's compensation claim under the second exclusion found in 85 O0.S.2011 § 312(6); that is, the trial court denied coverage on the basis that Claimant's injury occurred in an area where essential job functions are not performed. The three-judge panel, with one judge dissenting, affirmed. Based on our review, we vacate the Order and remand for further proceedings.

BACK…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Corbett v. Express PersonnelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Hogg v. Oklahoma County Juvenile BureauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Fudge v. University of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Richey v. Commander Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Barnhill v. Smithway Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. EWY v. SOUTHWEST CUPIDCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API