Legal Opinion

Bowdren v. Prudential Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided January 24, 2001No. 2505Published

1Opinion of the Court

HERRON, J.,

INTRODUCTION

The issue presented in this motion to compel appointment of arbitrators is whether arbitration should be *404compelled where the relevant arbitration provision sets forth limitations to arbitration that are contradictory and thus, ambiguous. For the reasons set forth below, this court concludes that the ambiguities in the policy must be interpreted against the insurer/drafter of the policy.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Petitioner William Bowdren, a Philadelphia police officer, was injured on March 23, 2000, while a passenger in an unmarked police car that was struck by an uninsured…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. National Grange Mutual Insurance v. KuhnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Brennan v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Messa v. State Farm InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Borgia v. Prudential Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. PBS Coal, Inc. v. Hardhat Mining, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API