Legal Opinion

Wolpers v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 5, 1945No. 39318PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue here is whether one having a communicable hazardous disease, tuberculosis, is "able to work and available for work" within the meaning of the Unemployment Compensation law (Sec. 9430, (c), R.S. 1939) and therefore eligible to receive benefits thereunder. The Unemployment Compensation Commission's award to the claimant was reversed and the cause remanded upon review by the circuit court and the case is brought here for adjudication. Trianon Hotel Co. v. Keitel, 350 Mo. 1041, 1045, 169 S.W.2d 891, 893[2, 4]. We think the circuit court was right.

Buena W. Doty instituted the proceeding…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. Board of Review v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Mills v. South Carolina Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. S. S. Kresge Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Bd. of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Producers Produce Co. v. Industrial Commission of Missouri Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. LaPlante v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Rapp v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF MISSOUREMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Poplar Bluff Printing Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API