In Re Twing
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to discharge one charged with violating an act regulating the hours of drug clerks. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner, an employee of a drugstore, was arrested, together with his employer, and charged with violating the provisions of section ■ 2 of an act of the legislature regulating the working hours of employees engaged in selling, at retail, drugs and medicines, compounding physicians’ prescriptions, and providing a penalty for its violation and the acts amendatory thereof. (Stats. 1905, p. 28, as amended by Stats. 1907, p. 273; Stats. 1921, p. 1323.) His contention on this application is that the police court of the city of Los Angeles,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- H. Hackfeld & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Bosley v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- People v. TisdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Ex parte KohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Gayer v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People v. FairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Gasque, Inc. v. NatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.