Legal Opinion

Department of Natural Resources v. France

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 13, 1976No. [No. 90, September Term, 1975.]PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0’Donnell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court. Smith, J., dissents and filed a dissenting opinion at page 465 infra.

In this case, we are called upon, for the purpose of venue, to locate the boundary line between two counties separated by a navigable river; at issue is whether the boundary line between Wicomico and Somerset Counties, at the confluence of the Wicomico and Nanticoke Rivers, runs along the mid-point of the geographic center of the water area of the *434Wicomico River, or whether it is fixed by the thalweg of the channel of the Wicomico River, located southward of its geographic…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Smith v. Gray Concrete Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Louisiana v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Iowa v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Maguire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Police Commissioner v. DowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. SchlossbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Unnamed Physician v. Commission on Medical DisciplineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API