Department of Natural Resources v. France
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
0’Donnell, J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court. Smith, J., dissents and filed a dissenting opinion at page 465 infra.
In this case, we are called upon, for the purpose of venue, to locate the boundary line between two counties separated by a navigable river; at issue is whether the boundary line between Wicomico and Somerset Counties, at the confluence of the Wicomico and Nanticoke Rivers, runs along the mid-point of the geographic center of the water area of the *434Wicomico River, or whether it is fixed by the thalweg of the channel of the Wicomico River, located southward of its geographic…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Smith v. Gray Concrete Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Louisiana v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Iowa v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Maguire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Police Commissioner v. DowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. SchlossbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Unnamed Physician v. Commission on Medical DisciplineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.