Legal Opinion

United States Lighterage Corp. v. Hoey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 8, 1944No. 212PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS, N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant owns and operates non-self-propelled barges documented under the laws of the United States and during the years 1936 to 1939 inclusive employed the customary bargees who were in sole charge of its vessels. It included in its Social Security Tax Returns for those years the earnings of its bargees and paid taxes thereon under Title IX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1101 et seq., for the years 1936 to 1939, and under Title VIII thereof, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq., for the years 1937 to 1939. Thereafter it filed refunding claims…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norton v. Warner Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Warner Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  3. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. RothensiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  4. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. RothensiesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Manhattan Lighterage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. WM. Spencer & Son Corp. v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Knudsen v. Lee & Simmons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Arnesen v. Manhattan Lighterage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  5. In re Arundel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API