Legal Opinion

In re Rosenfeld

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.

This is a motion, pursuant to section 275 of the Real Property Law, to compel the respondent, the holder of a mortgage on petitioners’ property, to execute an assignment thereof to the institution designated by petitioners. A demand was made prior to the bringing of this motion, which demand was refused.

There is no dispute as to the facts herein.

*668The mortgage held by the respondent bears interest at the rate of five per cent plus one-half of one per cent for servicing charge, plus one-half of one per cent for Federal Housing Administration insurance, making a total of six per cent per year…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mahnk v. BlanchardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 207 Realty Associates v. 210 Central Park North Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In re Joshua AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. In re RosenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API