Legal Opinion

Milanesi v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 13, 2021No. 2:18-cv-01320Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, Case No. 2:18-md-2846 INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson This document relates to: Milanesi v. C.R. Bard, Case No. 2:18-cv-01320 MOTIONS IN LIMINE OPINION AND ORDER NO. 35 Defendants’ Motion in Limine (“MIL”) No. 8 Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc. filed a Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Argument Concerning Alleged Fraud on the FDA, Misbranding, or Violation of FDA Regulations…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Lawrence R. Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  5. Indiana Insurance v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API